The Federal Reserve and the Bank of America are both in a position to become the new big banks in the future, and while some of their competitors are already getting into the game, there’s one big player out there that’s still in its infancy: traditional private lenders.
While traditional private lending companies have been around since the 1980s, they have been relatively slow to gain much traction in the marketplace, particularly because they aren’t insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC.
However, in recent years, the Federal Reserve has signaled it is moving towards a new approach.
Last year, the Fed raised the threshold for banks to start charging interest on loans, which will likely allow private lenders to grow at a faster rate than traditional banks.
The bank has also signaled it may start issuing bonds to help boost the value of traditional private loans.
So what does this mean for traditional private loan borrowers?
Traditional private lenders are often small, mid-sized or midsize firms with a small number of loans outstanding.
Because they typically have limited capital, they tend to be in a slower-growth phase.
But with the recent rise in private lending, they may be poised to start taking off in the coming years, according to Jeff Kagan, senior portfolio manager at Capital Advisors.
“We’ve seen a lot of companies that are in the private lending space,” Kagan told theScore.
“We expect that to continue in the next year or two.”
The Bank of the United States, which currently holds about $1 trillion in assets, is another example of a private lender that has already begun to grow.
The BofA is in the process of expanding into a new asset class, which could result in the company starting charging interest.
“The Fed is going to be taking the next step,” said Adam Klein, chief investment officer at BlackRock.
“They’re trying to build a financial product that’s better, more efficient, more stable, and that’s going to take a little while to come into the public eye.”
However, Klein noted that this isn’t the case for every private lender.
While traditional private banks generally charge high rates on loans with high loan-to-value ratios, a lot depends on the quality of the loans being used.
“For example, a $20,000 loan with a 20% discount rate could be good for a private lending company,” Klein said.
“But if the loan is at 5% interest, it could be worse.”
So how does a traditional private lender compare to private lenders?
Kagan said he thinks that traditional private borrowers tend to have lower credit scores than other private borrowers.
In fact, many of the borrowers who were the most successful in their loans are people who were under 30 years old, according the Credit Suisse Group.
Traditional private loans also have a lower credit score than private banks.
“If you want to get into the private banking space, there are probably some better alternatives out there,” Klein explained.
“There are a lot more good private lenders that aren’t private banks that can help you out.”
For more on the financial industry, watch: